🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an celebration that started out as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate functions where African descendants are paid to address predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Month

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in the second month, but also in October in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The period has transformed since that time, focusing less on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the observance is commemorated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it develops is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we saw the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a legislator gains confidence to say that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in the EU as a entirety.

In the US, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A campaign to scrub the history of people of color and experience from the historical documents is ongoing. One of the political figure's early administrative commands targeted the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the observance illustrates how minimally it can be influential if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered festivities of historical achievements, rather than confronting the situation of the current era. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. An academic expert, a professor at University of Greenwich, put it best when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden efforts for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month entirely, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an period that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an framework that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed through the year (as some institutions are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a time that does not evade political issues, and leaves space for people, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What value has simple recognition of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Institutions who observe it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to subtle slights, but faced with the dangers that face all if anti-racism is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and reactive. Perhaps an total re-identification is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.