Relatives' Anguish Over Coastal Degradation Endangering Coastal Norfolk Graves
Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.
An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards
Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.
A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”
Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.
Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles
One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”
“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy
Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.
“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”
She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”
Searching for Answers and Certainty
The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.
Several families are calling for more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.
“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”
A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”
He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”
The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.