🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to reinitiate nuclear negotiations with Washington as long as it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi stated exclusively dialogue was effective, and shared fresh requests had come from intermediaries to reopen negotiations with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran could not yet authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to access bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Navigating a Complex Route

Araghchi is treading a difficult path since Iran aims to avoid appear to be operating from a stance of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen stronger militarily and mentally from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium on home soil that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Earlier Discussions Suddenly Concluded

The prior phases of discussions between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with Donald Trump claiming the locations had been obliterated. Subsequently, EU nations exercised their right to reinstate international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Tehran representatives said they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with American involvement could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Representatives claimed on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the deal to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Position

Iranian officials declared the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the offer could be resurrected in various formats if discussions reopen.

The American leader last week claimed he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Tehran representatives say they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from America either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been charged of non-responsiveness in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran asserts diplomacy is not part of a show.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his speech to the gathering, aimed to portray the US as a controlling nation that misuses the idea of international law, the foreign minister stated the two-week conflict demonstrated the conflict could not be resolved by combat operations. He asserted the assaults commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and culminated with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were executed with full US knowledge and collaboration, making confidence hard to restore.

Diplomacy Remains the Final Answer

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had deserted negotiations; it was the United States and the western countries that had repeatedly sought to impose their demands during the discussions. Dialogue can still be active and stays the final answer to settle disagreements, but its requirements, rules and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"Provided that they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the language of dignity and respect, they will get a reply in the same language."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi stated he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We gained many lessons from this engagement; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He continued: "We successfully passed this war. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to destroy, continues to exist. The facilities and equipment, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but failed to shatter. The Iranian people have become more resilient, more united, and more backing of the government and the nation in the aftermath of this invasion."